Case Studies

Real-World Applications of the Decision Tree

This section presents case studies demonstrating how to apply the decision tree framework to real-world scenarios.

Case Study 1: Medical Image Classification

Problem Description

A healthcare startup is developing a deep learning model to classify chest X-rays for pneumonia detection. The model will assist radiologists in prioritizing cases for review.

Requirements Analysis

  • Computational constraints: Moderate - can handle 2-3x inference cost

  • Uncertainty needs: High - need to flag uncertain cases for human review

  • Data characteristics: Limited dataset (~5,000 images)

  • Safety requirements: Critical - misdiagnosis has serious consequences

Decision Path

  1. Need UQ? Yes - safety-critical application

  2. Computational budget? Moderate

  3. Primary uncertainty type? Both epistemic and aleatoric

Outcome

  • Successfully identified 95% of high-uncertainty cases

  • Reduced unnecessary human review by 40%

  • Acceptable computational overhead for clinical workflow

Case Study 2: Autonomous Vehicle Perception

Problem Description

An autonomous vehicle company needs uncertainty estimates for their object detection system to improve safety in edge cases.

Requirements Analysis

  • Computational constraints: Flexible - safety is paramount

  • Uncertainty needs: Critical - need epistemic uncertainty for rare events

  • Data characteristics: Large dataset but long-tail distribution

  • Latency requirements: Real-time inference (<50ms)

Decision Path

  1. Need UQ? Yes - safety-critical with long-tail events

  2. Computational budget? Flexible

  3. Primary uncertainty type? Epistemic - concern about rare scenarios

Recommended Approach

Deep ensemble with Monte Carlo Dropout

  • 5-model ensemble for robust uncertainty

  • MC Dropout for additional uncertainty in edge cases

  • Threshold-based decision making for safe operation

Outcome

  • Improved detection of out-of-distribution scenarios

  • 30% reduction in false confidence on edge cases

  • Acceptable inference time with optimized implementation

Case Study 3: Financial Forecasting

Problem Description

A fintech company uses neural networks for stock price prediction and wants to provide confidence intervals to users.

Requirements Analysis

  • Computational constraints: Tight - high-frequency trading scenario

  • Uncertainty needs: Moderate - users want confidence intervals

  • Data characteristics: Large historical dataset

  • Interpretability: Important for user trust

Decision Path

  1. Need UQ? Yes - users require confidence estimates

  2. Computational budget? Tight

  3. Need quick solution? Yes

Recommended Approach

Post-hoc calibration with quantile regression

  • Temperature scaling for calibrated probabilities

  • Quantile regression for prediction intervals

  • Minimal additional computational cost

Outcome

  • Provided well-calibrated confidence intervals

  • Negligible impact on inference latency

  • Improved user trust and decision-making

Case Study 4: Natural Language Processing

Problem Description

A content moderation platform needs to classify text as safe or unsafe, with uncertainty estimates to route borderline cases for human review.

Requirements Analysis

  • Computational constraints: Moderate - batch processing acceptable

  • Uncertainty needs: High - need to identify ambiguous content

  • Data characteristics: Large but evolving dataset

  • Distribution shift: Frequent - new types of content emerge

Decision Path

  1. Need UQ? Yes - need to handle ambiguous cases

  2. Computational budget? Moderate

  3. Distribution shift concerns? Yes - important factor

Recommended Approach

Monte Carlo Dropout with test-time augmentation

  • MC Dropout for epistemic uncertainty

  • Test-time augmentation for robustness

  • Human review threshold based on uncertainty

Outcome

  • 85% of ambiguous cases correctly flagged

  • 50% reduction in human review workload

  • Better handling of emerging content types

Lessons Learned

Key Takeaways

  1. Match method to constraints: Always consider computational budget first

  2. Validate uncertainty estimates: Use holdout data and OOD samples

  3. Iterate and refine: Start with simple methods, add complexity as needed

  4. Consider the full system: Uncertainty is most valuable when integrated into decision-making

  5. Domain expertise matters: Involve domain experts in setting thresholds

Common Success Factors

  • Clear understanding of uncertainty requirements

  • Appropriate computational resource allocation

  • Proper validation of uncertainty estimates

  • Integration with human decision-making workflows

  • Continuous monitoring and refinement